How EFL Teachers Want to be Supervised

Adil Abdul Rehman

Abstract


 

This paper provides a literature review of the field of teacher supervision with a focus on teachers’ voices and how they want to be supervised. The aim is to contribute to the literature on teacher supervision by reviewing studies in which teachers have articulated their beliefs and expectations regarding supervisory systems. The paper is divided into two parts. In the first part, the focus is on instructional leaders and what teachers expect from them. In the second part, the focus is on teacher involvement in the supervisory system and the importance of teacher feedback for improving supervisory systems. The paper ends with some practical considerations about making changes in supervisory systems based on teachers’ perspectives.

 

 


Keywords


teachers’ perceptions; instructional leaders; teacher involvement in supervisory systems

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdul Rehman, A., & Al-Bargi, A. (2014). Teachers' perspectives on post observation conferences: A study at a Saudi Arabian university. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(8), 1558-1568.

Arredondo-Rucinski, D., & Hazi, H. M. (2008). Supervision as mandated help: A policy review of professional development initiatives in selected states. In annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.

Bailey, K. M. (2006). Language teacher supervision : A case-based approach. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Blase, J., & Blase, J. (1999). Principals’ instructional leadership and teacher development: Teachers’ perspectives. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35(3), 349-378.

Blumberg, A., & Jonas, R. S. (1987). Permitting access: The teacher's control over supervision. Educational Leadership, 44, 58-62.

Breedlove, P. H. (2011). Teacher evaluation in North Carolina: Teacher perceptions during a time of change (Doctoral dissertation).

Bulach, C., & Peterson, T. (1999). Levels of openness and trust: Do principals walk the talk? Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of Eastern Educational Research Association, Hilton Head, NC.

Caughlan, S., & Jiang, H. (2014). Observation and teacher quality: Critical analysis of observational instruments in preservice teacher performance assessment. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(5), 375-388.

Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). Teacher educators as researchers: Multiple perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 219-225.

Danielson, C. (2001). New trends in teacher evaluation. Educational leadership, 58(5), 12-15.

Danielson, C., & McGreal, T. L. (2000). Teacher evaluation to enhance professional practice. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Davis, D. R., Pool, J. E., & Mits-Cash, M. (2000). Issues in implementing a new teacher assessment system in a large urban school district: Results of a qualitative field study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 14(4), 285-306.

Elliott, B., & Calderhead, J. (1995). Mentoring for teacher development possibilities and caveats. In T. Kerry, & S. Mayes (Eds.), Issues in mentoring (pp.11-24). London, England: Open University Press.

Garman, N. B. (1990). Theories embedded in the events of clinical supervision: A hermeneutic approach. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 5, 201-213.

Gebhard, J.G. (1990). Models of supervision: Choice. In J.C. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp.156-166). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Glanz, J. (2007). On vulnerability and transformative leadership: An imperative for leaders of supervision. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(2), 115-135. doi: 10.1080/13603120601097462

Goldsberry, L. F. (1984). Reality--really? A response to McFaul and Cooper. Educational Leadership, 41(7), 10-11.

Hazi, H. M., & Arredondo Rucinski, D. (2009). Teacher evaluation as policy target: Viable reform venue or just another tap dance? ERS Spectrum, 27(3), 31-40.

oerr, T. R. (1998). A case for merit pay. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(4), 326.

Kelly, C. L. (2006). Teacher evaluation and its relationship to teacher practice and student achievement in a successful urban middle school: A case study (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3237735)

Kennedy, M. M. (2005). Inside teaching. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Lansman, R. R. (2006). A case study of teacher evaluation and supervision at a high-achieving urban elementary school (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3233791)

Loughran, J. (2014). Professionally developing as a teacher educator. Journal of Teacher Education. doi: 10.1177/0022487114533386

Marshall, K. (2005). The why’s and how’s of teacher evaluation rubrics. Edge, 2(1), 2–19.

Marshall, K. (2008). Is supervising the heck out of teachers the answer? Education Week, 27(36), 23–25.

Milanowski, A. T., & Heneman III, H. G. (2001). Assessment of teacher reactions to a standards-based teacher evaluation system: A pilot study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 15(3), 193-212.

Murdoch, G. (2000). Introducing a teacher-supportive evaluation system. ELT Journal, 54(1), 54-64. doi: 10.1093/elt/54.1.54

Nicholson–Goodman, J., & Garman, N. B. (2007). Mapping practitioner perceptions of ‘It’s research based’: Scientific discourse, speech acts and the use and abuse of research. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(3), 283-299. doi: 10.1080/13603120701257297

Pizzi, J. D. (2009). Urban secondary teachers’ perceptions of a standards-based teacher evaluation system (Doctoral dissertation).

Protheroe, N. (2002). Improving instruction through teacher observation. Principal, 82(1), 48-51.

Retrieved from http://dlib.bc.edu/islandora/object/bc-ir:101691/datastream/PDF/view

Robles F (2007) Veteran teachers’ perspectives on teacher evaluation and how they want to be evaluated. EdD thesis, University of the Pacific.

Sahakian, P., & Stockton, J. (1996). Opening doors: Teacher guided observations. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 50-53.

Schumacher, G. T. (2004). Perceptions of the impact of a standards-based teacher evaluation system, based on the Danielson 'framework for teaching' model, on teaching and student learning (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3128070)

Shinkfield, A. J., & Stufflebeam, D. L. (1996). Teacher evaluation: Guide to effective practice. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

Smyth, J. (1988). A "critical" perspective for clinical supervision. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 3(2), 136-156.

Toch, T. (2008). Fixing Teacher Evaluation. Educational Leadership, 66(2), 32-37.

Toch, T., & Rothman, R. (2008). Rush to judgment: Teacher evaluation in public education. Education Sector Reports. Education Sector. Retrieved from http://www.educationsector.org/usr_doc/RushToJudgment_ES_Jan08.pdf

Toch, T., & Rothman, R. (2008). Rush to judgment: Teacher evaluation in public education. Education Sector Reports. Education Sector. Retrieved from http://www.educationsector.org/usr_doc/RushToJudgment_ES_Jan08.pdf

Valentine, J. W., & Prater, M. (2011). Instructional, transformational, and managerial leadership and student achievement: High school principals make a difference. NASSP BULLETIN, 95(1), 5-30. doi:10.1177/0192636511404062

Waintroob, A. R. (1995). Remediating and dismissing the incompetent teacher. School Administrator, 52(5), 20–24.

Wang, W., & Day, C. (2002). Issues and concerns about classroom observation: Teachers' perspectives. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL), St. Louis, MO.

Welsh-Treglia, A. M. (2002). An analysis of perceptions of secondary teachers with respect to performance feedback (Doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3069407)

Zimmerman, S., & Deckert-Pelton, M. (2003). Evaluating the evaluators: Teachers' perceptions of the principal's role in professional evaluation. NASSP BULLETIN, 87(636), 28-37.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.0786/jasr.v1i1.18344

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2018 Adil Abdul Rehman

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.